small doubt, we should show day of Admission in these 2 views right  

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6684#issuecomment-1873510876

+1 fix the top i.e header part (buttons are stretched a lot to occupy the entire row, where it can occupy two or three buttons as per the screen size) 

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6961#issuecomment-1873507424

 Collapsing the sidebar because long addresses cause overlapping with the buttons.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6960#issuecomment-1873501048

I am currently working on: - Formatting typed input for date and time. - Fixing the issue where scrolling does not automatically bring the selected hour, minute, or current hour and minute into view. For reference: https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/test-scroll-8j2rl6 - Improving the overall styling.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6959#issuecomment-1873464469

@Ashesh3 @rithviknishad Could you please check the following link on a mobile device and suggest any improvements for scrolling https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/react-scroll-time-forked-nxnxjn https://nxnxjn.csb.app/

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6858#issuecomment-1872480959

@Ashesh3 I implemented it, when checking it in mobile the scroll is not working the minutes are constant I checked the same with the link you provided in mobile, same issue, unable to scroll 🥲

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6858#issuecomment-1872459025

   @Ashesh3 @rithviknishad can you please look into this I am exploring whether we can implement an infinite scroll for hours and minutes. Currently, when a user reaches the end, i.e., 23 hours or 59 minutes, the scroll stops. However, in the browser's default date-time input, the scroll is continuous.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6858#issuecomment-1870410061

 @rithviknishad is this expected behavior or should I create an issue in backend the status code should 404 instead it is 500

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6857#issuecomment-1864397999

@rithviknishad can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6858#issuecomment-1853752383

@rithviknishad can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6858#issuecomment-1853730783

@rithviknishad could you please review it

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6857#issuecomment-1853397773

I tried to replicate it but couldn't manage to get the expected message  

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6811#issuecomment-1847585236

  the API response does not contain the patient name

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6811#issuecomment-1847560524

@rithviknishad

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6761#issuecomment-1843451345

@rithviknishad I have a small question. Instead of adding a reusable function that redirects to a new URL, which I think adds complexity, especially with the proposed step: `Add a redirect route care.app/consultation/<consultation_id> that would redirect to the actual URL (/facility/:id/patient/:id/consultation/:id).` My concern is that when an invalid URL is entered, data is already fetched. Then, when redirecting to "consulation/:id," data is loaded again. If we need to perform a redirect, we require both facilityId and patientId. Upon redirecting to "/facility/:id/patient/:id/consultation/:id," the correct URL loads the data again. I consider this approach to be increasing complexity. What if we modify the URL in place, for example, "facility/<invalid_id>/patient/<invalid_id>/consultation/<valid_consultation_id>"? If it's invalid, we can change it in place without any redirect to the correct details. I thinking for a reusable function to do it in place

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6761#issuecomment-1841159215

I would like to work on it, can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6761#issuecomment-1838932344

  I tried to hardcode and selected the default Location 2 ID but didn't understand why it is not showing location2 Even on selecting Location 2 it's not getting selected `c3b2a9c7-dcc4-4ec0-bb08-97ab3782d311`

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6773#issuecomment-1837485125

    I tried to hardcode and selected the default Location 2 ID but didn't understand why it is not showing location2 Even on selecting Location 2 it's not getting selected The ID's test asset and location2 are the same both have the same id is this the reason why it's not showing the location2 in the field? `c3b2a9c7-dcc4-4ec0-bb08-97ab3782d311`

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6773#issuecomment-1837483812

I would like to work on it can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6773#issuecomment-1837111175

@nihal467 Then which field should be mandatory to prevent from submitting a blank normal log update

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6738#issuecomment-1835942467

should I remove ICU and automated from filter?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6713#issuecomment-1835464374

  changed to lowercase because in round type it is lowercase

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6713#issuecomment-1835462105

Gigin suggested the implementation since most users will have only one insurance detail. If they have more than one, display all on a separate page

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6517#issuecomment-1827674261

@rithviknishad, can you please share the type of 'takeAt' we are using similar type in Care Anywhere?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6713#issuecomment-1827347422

@rithvik just a minor fix i will do it now

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6616#issuecomment-1812086965

@nihal467 I checked where the issue is, can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6610#issuecomment-1812017129

I would like to work on it, can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6605#issuecomment-1811931427

I would like to work on it and discuss it in today's EOD call.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6603#issuecomment-1811917093

@nihal467  is it required to move the buttons to right even this view because it not looks good 

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6573#issuecomment-1803569792

I think this approach can help us reduce space wastage.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6517#issuecomment-1795569588

@aparnacoronasafe @rithviknishad   

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6517#issuecomment-1795535909

okay Thank you @rithviknishad

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6533#issuecomment-1794992421

@rithviknishad ,I don't know why loading dummy data into the Care backend Cypress test failed. Is this something I need to work on?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6533#issuecomment-1794981329

I would like work on this can, you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6546#issuecomment-1794169433

Hello @aparnacoronasafe I have added insurance details to the patient’s details page. However, I noticed that we can add multiple insurance details (e.g., Insurance Details 1, Insurance Details 2, Insurance Details 3, etc.). I have a few questions regarding this: - How would you like these multiple insurance details to be displayed on the patient’s details page? I have attached some images of my implementation for your reference. - Initially, I thought of adding a simple card in the same row as the location details and medical details. However, only one insurance detail can be added in this row. If no insurance details are present, should I display a message stating that no insurance details are recorded or simply not show the card? - What should be done if there are multiple insurance details? If the next detail is displayed in the next row, it may lead to wastage of space. - Could you clarify how the four details (Member ID*, Policy ID/Policy Name*, Insurer ID, Insurer Name) should be aligned in the card? Please note that Member ID* and Policy ID/Policy Name* are mandatory while Insurer ID and Insurer Name are not.    

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6517#issuecomment-1791106894

Hello @rithviknishad Sorry for the delay I will make a pr for this by tomorrow.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6483#issuecomment-1787061322

I would like work on it, can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6517#issuecomment-1784470789

Hello @rithviknishad can you review it now

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6461#issuecomment-1784086272

Hello @rithviknishad currenlty when disabling the prefetch when facilityId is undefined the list is not updating in BadgeList.tsx https://www.loom.com/share/c125a233ce1f4713a691495a5c73900e?sid=7db3e57f-cdc4-4243-aac0-b6fc5ae465ce I even tried `prefetch = faciltiyId !==undefined && faciltiyId !==null && faciltiyId !==null` but the badgeList is not updating when i tried with request instead of useQuery for get requests in bageList it is working fine but the useEffects and useStates remain same

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6461#issuecomment-1784071196

``` const { loading: isResourceLoading } = useQuery(routes.getAnyFacility, { pathParams: { id: String(filter.approving_facility) }, onResponse: ({ res, data }) => { if (res && data) { setFilterState({ approving_facility_ref: data }); } }, prefetch: filter.approving_facility !== undefined, }); // useEffect(() => { // async function fetchData() { // if (filter.approving_facility) { // setResourceLoading(true); // const res = await dispatch( // getAnyFacility(filter.approving_facility, "approving_facility") // ); // if (res && res.data) { // setFilterState({ approving_facility_ref: res.data }); // } // setResourceLoading(false); // } // } // fetchData(); // }, [dispatch]); ```  @rithviknishad when I apply a filter and see filter it is showing undefined the above I tried to debug the above code within useEffect is working fine but changing it to useQuery it shows undefined in the filter

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6461#issuecomment-1782651381

@nihal467 there is a minor issue with the filtering, and I will fix by today.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6461#issuecomment-1782328248

@rithviknishad I didn't understand why auto-label conflicts and lint codebase arise even though Cypress passed.

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6461#issuecomment-1780786572

I would like work on this can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6483#issuecomment-1776699238

@print-Sathvik are you still working on it? if not @rithviknishad can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6381#issuecomment-1767572539

How to pass or change query for commentSection in paginaltedList Apart from that are there any changes required?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6461#issuecomment-1766098817

I would like to work on it, can you please assign me

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6443#issuecomment-1757711333

Hey @rithviknishad when trying to implement ```PaginatedList```in ```ResultList.tsx```, filtering is not working. Can you please review it once? Should I make a PR, or should I continue working on implementing PaginatedList?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6402#issuecomment-1750514170

Hey @rithviknishad delete record is not working as expected and I am still working on fixing it apart from that are there any changes required?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6402#issuecomment-1748629231

Hey @rithviknishad delete record is not working as expected and I am still working on fixing it Apart from that are there any changes required?

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/pull/6402#issuecomment-1748629007

I'd like to work on this

https://github.com/coronasafe/care_fe/issues/6360#issuecomment-1741119968